Like any human being who follows the news at least - European for that matter - everyone knows that 57% of our Swiss neighbors have recently voted for ban construction of minarets , the most conspicuous ornaments and more aggressive, to the eye "infidel", which mosques are mushrooming all over Europe, converted longstanding religious relativism revolutionary planted with love two hundred years ago by Napoleon and his gardeners Grunts. A bit like when the accession of Jean-Marie Le Pen in the second round of elections 2002 presidential, the universe and reactionary nationalism and the whole "réacosphère" Internet is boiling, and exult within the scope of a victory which I would like to receive as well as they effect real and lasting especially .
If it is obviously not wrong to feel some pleasure in mocking this news, especially consultant oh so predictable reactions policies and journalists followers of the self-righteousness, it must be emphasized also that the referendum is a stab in the water and it will not be more efficient than the second round in 2002 already mentioned. It has indeed escaped anyone that even without minarets, mosques are still there, as well as Muslim populations: one wonders how so many could be happy with a small score as 57% when the question would should focus on banning the construction of mosques and even on the Prohibition of the Muslim faith. I was probably answer that it is always a beginning and that's encouraging, as the survey which has just announced that 41% of French people are against building new mosques : Well not necessarily as to principles.
Their attitude to this new shows paradoxes which are perfectly unable to rid the reactionary and nationalistic French (but also European), they are stuck in the republican and democratic system. From a formal point of view, this political trend proves once again that she cherishes the enemy weapons, such weapons are responsible for the destruction of traditional France they sometimes call themselves - some Republicans are sincere - ultimate defenders. This weapon is democracy and popular sovereignty, and the concept of self-governing nation which implies that the nature of it is potentially scalable, since it is the fruit not more than a divine right and a tradition concentrated in the hands of a king, but an expression of general will be subject to change and all manipulations of the view that we know. Historically, it is therefore the revolutionary movement and the victory of individualism, which manifest themselves in both religious relativism that the right to vote - it being essential that the voice of every individual counts as much, regardless of its condition and his beliefs - which allowed the uprooting of France (and other European states) and the very possibility of the emergence of a strong Muslim population. Believe that more democracy is the only solution against the Islamization is as naive as to believe the same thing vis-à-vis the European construction: these phenomena are the logical consequences of the destruction of the French monarchy and the advent of a republic which wants to overrun any border and particularism.
For beyond this formal problem which is already considerable, there is also a problem of funds which is superimposed, that of secularism and freedom of worship. It was clearly seen in the history of the republic, not only the establishment of this regime is inseparable from hostility to Catholicism before Vatican He, too tainted in the eyes of our "pure" centuries by the alliance of throne and the altar, but the reactionary right as the far right, since the promotion of Islam by the Left has accompanied the anti-Catholicism have never been able to defend themselves other than by a secularism that reaches so funny that the left, not hesitating to sacrifice Catholicism in private if it is possible to do the same for Islam. Suffice to say that this policy scorched-earth equivalent to only shoot themselves in the foot in view of the zero efficiency on the other side. It was a very good example of this attitude in the draft 2007 of the Movement for France Philippe de Villiers, who only provided a charter for the republican construction of mosques and the confinement of religion to the private sphere. This simple vis-à-vis Islam, although basic, was sufficient to react Marine Le Pen, whose National Front prefers denounce immigration for not talking about the religious problem in itself. We understand why all these people who claim to defend the French tradition is no wonder the place of religion in society. They fall into the trap full of Republican revolutionary leveling absolute value religions vis-à-vis our history, knowing full well that stand up to human rights and the republican constitution would opt out of the system they claim to fight: we will not even entitled to claim of a situation that would resemble the Concordat of 1801, but a full claim of the separation of church and state in 1905.
Because the only real solution to the problem of Islamization, they are not referenda that will not prevent the Muslim population to move forward and vote from the right to build as they wish in a few decades, this does is not secularism and religious relativism egalitarian engulfing our Catholic tradition, while the enemy is still progressing, still less the nation autonomous and sovereign people, as this concept carries the seeds of the very possibility of rejection of tradition. The solution involves first the overthrow of the republic and through it the original sin which is the French Revolution, which carry with them all the principles that are available to Muslims, but also, more importantly, the restoration of the French monarchy whose king legitimate custodian of its own sovereignty, full and independent, is the guarantor of the principles Essentials of French civilization and, by the oaths of his coronation, religion Catholic state to protect. If we do not have the courage to reconnect with our history, never we nor our descendants will not be relieved of the Muslim population and religious pressures and far to experience a phenomenon similar to the Reconquista and expulsion of the Moriscos under Philip III of Spain, is the fate of Byzantine Constantinople and that we will suffer with the shame of being defeated without firing a shot.
If it is obviously not wrong to feel some pleasure in mocking this news, especially consultant oh so predictable reactions policies and journalists followers of the self-righteousness, it must be emphasized also that the referendum is a stab in the water and it will not be more efficient than the second round in 2002 already mentioned. It has indeed escaped anyone that even without minarets, mosques are still there, as well as Muslim populations: one wonders how so many could be happy with a small score as 57% when the question would should focus on banning the construction of mosques and even on the Prohibition of the Muslim faith. I was probably answer that it is always a beginning and that's encouraging, as the survey which has just announced that 41% of French people are against building new mosques : Well not necessarily as to principles.
Their attitude to this new shows paradoxes which are perfectly unable to rid the reactionary and nationalistic French (but also European), they are stuck in the republican and democratic system. From a formal point of view, this political trend proves once again that she cherishes the enemy weapons, such weapons are responsible for the destruction of traditional France they sometimes call themselves - some Republicans are sincere - ultimate defenders. This weapon is democracy and popular sovereignty, and the concept of self-governing nation which implies that the nature of it is potentially scalable, since it is the fruit not more than a divine right and a tradition concentrated in the hands of a king, but an expression of general will be subject to change and all manipulations of the view that we know. Historically, it is therefore the revolutionary movement and the victory of individualism, which manifest themselves in both religious relativism that the right to vote - it being essential that the voice of every individual counts as much, regardless of its condition and his beliefs - which allowed the uprooting of France (and other European states) and the very possibility of the emergence of a strong Muslim population. Believe that more democracy is the only solution against the Islamization is as naive as to believe the same thing vis-à-vis the European construction: these phenomena are the logical consequences of the destruction of the French monarchy and the advent of a republic which wants to overrun any border and particularism.
For beyond this formal problem which is already considerable, there is also a problem of funds which is superimposed, that of secularism and freedom of worship. It was clearly seen in the history of the republic, not only the establishment of this regime is inseparable from hostility to Catholicism before Vatican He, too tainted in the eyes of our "pure" centuries by the alliance of throne and the altar, but the reactionary right as the far right, since the promotion of Islam by the Left has accompanied the anti-Catholicism have never been able to defend themselves other than by a secularism that reaches so funny that the left, not hesitating to sacrifice Catholicism in private if it is possible to do the same for Islam. Suffice to say that this policy scorched-earth equivalent to only shoot themselves in the foot in view of the zero efficiency on the other side. It was a very good example of this attitude in the draft 2007 of the Movement for France Philippe de Villiers, who only provided a charter for the republican construction of mosques and the confinement of religion to the private sphere. This simple vis-à-vis Islam, although basic, was sufficient to react Marine Le Pen, whose National Front prefers denounce immigration for not talking about the religious problem in itself. We understand why all these people who claim to defend the French tradition is no wonder the place of religion in society. They fall into the trap full of Republican revolutionary leveling absolute value religions vis-à-vis our history, knowing full well that stand up to human rights and the republican constitution would opt out of the system they claim to fight: we will not even entitled to claim of a situation that would resemble the Concordat of 1801, but a full claim of the separation of church and state in 1905.
Because the only real solution to the problem of Islamization, they are not referenda that will not prevent the Muslim population to move forward and vote from the right to build as they wish in a few decades, this does is not secularism and religious relativism egalitarian engulfing our Catholic tradition, while the enemy is still progressing, still less the nation autonomous and sovereign people, as this concept carries the seeds of the very possibility of rejection of tradition. The solution involves first the overthrow of the republic and through it the original sin which is the French Revolution, which carry with them all the principles that are available to Muslims, but also, more importantly, the restoration of the French monarchy whose king legitimate custodian of its own sovereignty, full and independent, is the guarantor of the principles Essentials of French civilization and, by the oaths of his coronation, religion Catholic state to protect. If we do not have the courage to reconnect with our history, never we nor our descendants will not be relieved of the Muslim population and religious pressures and far to experience a phenomenon similar to the Reconquista and expulsion of the Moriscos under Philip III of Spain, is the fate of Byzantine Constantinople and that we will suffer with the shame of being defeated without firing a shot.
0 comments:
Post a Comment